About CosmicPhilosophy.org
The Introduction to Cosmic Philosophy
eBook and the corresponding Neutrinos Do Not Exist
case, bundled with a state of the art AI translation of German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz' ∞ infinite Monad theory (Monadology), provided the basis for the founding of the CosmicPhilosophy.org project. The books are published in 42 languages.
Leibniz Monadology is one of the most iconic works in the history of philosophy and the new German publication of the book on CosmicPhilosophy.org might qualitatively rival the original German translation because the AI was trained on all the works of Leibniz for a deep understanding of Leibniz meaning
combined with advanced knowledge for translating that meaning. For many languages and countries, the publication of the book is a world first. The book is published in two PDF formats and ePub for eReaders.
AI Research System for Philosophy
In 2024 an advanced AI communication system was developed for a global philosophical survey for 🦋 GMODebate.org that involved managing complex philosophical conversations with people at tens of thousands of nature protection organizations globally in over 100 languages.
The project yielded profound conversations in many different languages and one French writer from Paris even remarked Au fait, votre français est excellent. Vous vivez en 🇫🇷 France ?
(Your French is excellent. Are you from France?
), which is significant when considering the higher-level language used in philosophical discussions about morality as an aspect beyond language
for the purpose of protecting nature against 🧬 eugenics.
Later that year as a subsequent AI philosophy research project, a custom AI research system was developed for the purpose of an investigation of physics and cosmology.
The investigation costed just two weeks time and resulted in the Neutrinos Do Not Exist
case and the founding of CosmicPhilosophy.org.
The neutrino concept has been of interest to the author for a longer time, as it was perceived as a potential candidate for playing a role at the root of consciousness. In 2020 the author was banned
from asking a question about it on philosophy.stackexchange.com.
Philosophy professor Daniel C. Dennett said the following about the idea in a topic that author started titled Consciousness Without a 🧠 Brain
(5th post, his first post on the forum):
Dennett:
That is not in any way a theory about consciousness. ... It's as if you are trying to tell me that the introduction of a new sprocket in a car line's engine is important to city planning and traffic control.
My reply in defense of the neutrino-consciousness theory:
Author:
It can be stated that what has preceded the senses has preceded the human. Therefore one is required to look outside the scope of the bodily individual for the origin of consciousness.
Paranormal Dream With 20+ Years Chronological Content
When the author was a 15 year old child, he had a paranormal dream (a one-off experience without cause) that showed chronological content of more than 20 years time into the future. Preceding that strange dream, he had a vision that showed a sort of infinite cloth of particles that embodied the essence of life
and that expressed the quality pure happiness
.
The author has always been skeptical about paranormal matters privately and was never engaged in paranormal matters. Nor did he hold a special consideration for the dream at an early age. [Read More]
The author has always been skeptical about paranormal matters privately and was never engaged in paranormal matters. Nor did he hold a special consideration for the dream at an early age. The author initially forgot about the dream rapidly.
The author simply observed the various parts of the dream to chronologically coherently occur in a 20 year time span, culminating into an attack on his home in the city Utrecht, Netherlands 20 years later, which was also shown in that dream (in an apartment coincidentally located opposite from the Paranormal Research Institute of the Netherlands), and has been faced with this information in a neutral way.
The 2019 attack on author's home was perpetrated by the of pedophilia accused Justice Department of Netherlands and was potentially linked to author's ✈️ MH17 investigation, which was revealed by a confession by the perpetrator.
The paranormal topic has been put aside after writing the above linked article on temporal clairvoyance which contains some basic information. Paranormal is not a topic of interest of the author, but perhaps the evidence that viewing 20 years into the future is possible, is vital for the ability to understand certain aspects. As of now however, it is unknown to the author how it is possible or what it would reveal about reality. At least the causality idea can be revisited more easily in a profound sense based on this given intuition
.
The vision of nature, once having observed that the multiple chronological parts in the corresponding dream occurred one by one, caused the author to develop a special interest in the neutrino concept.
Investigation of the Neutrino Concept
The philosophical investigation was primarily set to investigate the neutrino concept.
Shortly after starting the investigation, there were indications that the neutrino concept couldn't be valid and after investigating it further, the root of the neutrino concept was traced to a dogmatic mathematical attempt to escape ∞ infinite divisibility.
The concept Cosmic Philosophy
originates from reading about Gottfried Leibniz his work and the relation between his infinite Monad theory and ancient Greek cosmic philosophy
.
While the field Philosophy of Cosmology
might be inclined to align with science
(be an addition to science), the idea of Cosmic Philosophy
is intended to allow departure from science without departing from the primary interest that science was originally intended to serve
for philosophy: an accurate understanding of the cosmos.
Dogmatic Corruption
The logic that was discovered in the two weeks during investigation of physics was so simple that the first impression of the author was that the investigation rather concerned an investigation of corruption instead of potentially invalid ideas of science. For this reason, the project CosmicPhilosophy.org is intended to inspire others to break out of the dogmatic framework of science.
In the past years during participation on various philosophy discussion forums and studying various philosophers, it became apparent to the author that many modern philosophers have adopted a blind slave-like position towards science.
A philosopher on author's questioning of the neutrino concept:
I don't think it is philosophy's job to investigate science's claims.
Self-imposed Enslavement to Scientism
The author recognized that philosophy as a field may historically have instantiated or contributed to the development of dogmatic scientism with the selection of specific icons of Western philosophy
.
For example, pillar of philosophy
Emmanuel Kant's apodictical certainty
concept, which is knowledge that is necessarily true and cannot be doubted and more specifically concerns the belief in the realness (non-disputableness) of space and time, is dogmatically adopted and fundamentally underlays his whole philosophy.
Kant's concept of apodictic certainty goes beyond just a strong claim
and is a claim of absolute, indubitable truth, which is akin to religious dogma. Kant scholars write the following about Kant's account of reason that fundamentally underlays the concept:
We might note that Kant never discussed reason as such. This leaves a difficult interpretative task: just what is Kant’s general and positive account of reason?
The first thing to note is Kant’s bold claim that reason is the arbiter of truth in all judgments—empirical as well as metaphysical. Unfortunately, he barely develops this thought, and the issue has attracted surprisingly little attention in the literature.
Kant'sReasonSource: plato.stanford.edu
Similar to religions, by neglecting to address the fundamental nature of reason
, Kant abused the fundamental mystery of existence for an absolute truth claim and that provides evidence of intent
to establish dogmatic scientism when viewed in light of the purpose clearly communicated at the start of Kant's philosophical project: the grounding of science with indubitable
certainty.
The same abuse of the mystery of existence is seen in René Descartes famous claim cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore I am
) that similar to Kant's apodictical certainty seeks to establish indubitable truth.
In the work of pillar of philosophy
Edmund Husserl, the aspiration to ground science with certainty
is set forward from the start and Husserl even profoundly deviates from his past philosophy in a later attempt to serve that primary purpose: the grounding of science (which means: enabling science to depart from philosophy through dogma).
Mystery of Existence
The mystery of existence has a paradoxical ability to facilitate the strongest conviction possible in experiential beings, exemplified most simply by Decartes cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore I am
), and rather than a psychological flaw it might be considered a fundamental moral driver
. However, that does not imply that philosophy as a field should yield
to scientism.
Albert Einstein's
Dismissal of Philosophy
Albert Einstein's brutal
dismissal of philosophy at a gathering of the Philosophy Society of France shortly after having received his Nobel Prize in 1921, which is covered on our blog (citation and link below), is a culmination of a then centuries ongoing movement to emancipate science from philosophy that in part originated from icons of philosophy since as early as René Descartes.
Albert Einstein in front of a gathering of philosophers in 1921:
Die Zeit der Philosophen ist vorbeiEinstein versus Philosophy On 🕒 Time: Why A French Philosopher Attempted to Have Einstein's Nobel Prize Revoked Source: CosmicPhilosophy.org
The time of the philosophers is over
From the works of Descartes, Kant, and Husserl to the contemporary era, a recurring theme emerges: the self-imposed attempt to enslave philosophy to scientism.
The CosmicPhilosophy.org project hopes to inspire that philosophy must break free from this subservient position and reclaim its rightful role as a leading exploratory discipline.
As one philosopher argued in a forum discussion on scientism: philosophy has no business yielding to this
.
The philosopher who made this argument did so in the openings post of his topic On the Absurd Hegemony of Science
that has been published as an eBook on our philosophical project on scientism, 🦋 GMODebate.org. The discussion includes a fierce debate between the cited philosopher and professor Daniel C. Dennett with over 400 posts dedicated to Dennett's defense of his rejection of 🧠⃤ Qualia.
On the Absurd Hegemony of Science A Debate of Scientism and 🧠⃤ Qualia with professor Daniel C. Dennett. Source: 🦋 GMODebate.org
Philosophy has no business yielding to [scientism]...
While some might argue that better than dogma isn't possible from an experiental perspective and that in comparison with other dogma's such as religious dogma's, scientism is a better choice. Philosophy, unlike science, has the special ability to question dogma itself and therewith has the capability to progress beyond dogma.
As the cited philosopher put it: philosophy is the most open field
The concept Cosmic Philosophy
is intended as a field scope that allows one to progress in cosmology beyond science from the perspective of accurate and valid philosophy. Cosmic Philosophy would involve pure philosophy for cosmological understanding or an exploration of the cosmos with philosophy
.
Cosmic Philosophy
Share your insights and comments with us at info@cosmicphilosophy.org.
CosmicPhilosophy.org: Understanding the Cosmos and Nature with Philosophy